www.dynamometer-info.co.uk           English | French | German | Spanish | Italian

   
  Welcome & Introduction
  What is a dynamometer?
  Engine Dynamometer
  Chassis Dynamometer
  Inertia or Brake dyno?
  Advantages of each type
  Losses, and "flywheel" BHP
  Does it damage engines?
  Does it damage tyres?
   
  What to choose or avoid!
  Dynamometer Hardware
  Dynamometer Software
  Accuracy / Repeatability
  Download Dyno Software
 
  Correction Factors
  Why some read High / Low
  Vehicle's Dyno Preparation
  Exhaust Gas Analysers
  Importance of cooling!
  Exhaust gas extraction!
   
  Some Interesting Links
  Contact details
  DIY Dynamometers!
  Dyno Manufacturers

Site Map

Privacy Policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why some Chassis Dynamometer Systems seem to read High or Low when compared to others...

There are lots of reasons, and most of them relate to people comparing different "things" or measurements.

 

Very occasionally a dynamometer actually MAY be calibrated badly, either by accident or because an engine tuner knows his customers like to see "bigger BHP numbers" than their car really puts out, especially AFTER tuning...

But usually a "high" sounding BHP figure, or "low" readings are more a case of not comparing like with like.

For example...

  • The first thing you need to compare is if the BHP figures are measure at the "REAR WHEEL" or calculated at the "FLYWHEEL" or engine.  This is a real "big" difference!   Always compare the actual MEASURED rear wheel BHP figures only.  Flywheel / engine figures are always much higher, but at best a rough guess or estimate... See here Flywheel figures cannot be trusted and are a "rough" guide at best.

  • The second thing you need to compare is the actual correction factor used.  E.g. does it say DIN 70020, SAEJ1349, EEC, ECE, ISO, or some other?   Because depending on which correction factor was used, the results figures vary, according to conditions.  For e.g. DIN 70020 standard often results in "larger" figures than other commonly used formulas.   Non of them are actually wrong as such - just different standards.  If it says nothing, or just "corrected" on your graph / data it is useless and if you are using is as a measure of power, rather than for comparative purposes, you may as well throw it away.  But for power comparisons you MUST always compare like with like!   See here for correction factor page.  My own Dyno Systems

  • If the dyno has inadequate airflow, then the first few runs will show good "normal" consistent power, and all the subsequent ones will show less, and less, as the vehicle, transmission, engine oil, engine block, airbox and bodywork heat up (heat soak) to temperatures that are higher than would be seen on say a motorway.   Partly because the air (and to some extent the fuel) that the engine receive get warmer!  A few degrees here makes a large difference.  See here.

 

  • Twin roller braked systems, or single rollers that are "too small" both cause tyre deformation, and so see losses that reduce the measured power.  This effect increases with MPH and weight, varies with tyre pressures etc, so simply cannot be "allowed"  for during  "calibration".  It can be quite considerable!  Single drum systems with 16 inch diameter drums are about the minimum that should be used, after a lot of experimentation!  At this diameter or above the effect is small enough to effectively be ignored.

 

 

 

All content, design, images, text, information copyright DynoPower Dynamometer Systems & John C Williamson

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

eXTReMe Tracker