|
Site Map
Privacy Policy
|
| |
Automotive dynamometers, accuracy and repeatability.
These are two
totally different things so lets separate them!
-
Repeatability
Its
entirely possible to have a Dynamometer that is calibrated
wrongly, but can give very accurate repeatable back
to back runs! And this is frequently the case.
It does not really matter if the actual power and torque
figures are 20% out, if all you are looking for is gains in
performance, or trying to iron out a fuelling problem for
example. Provided that the dyno gives truly repeatable
results then there is no problem. This requires LOTS
of airflow, and very controlled conditions and so can be
aided by a good "setup" and experienced operator that knows
these things.
And in most cases
a good well designed inertial Dynamometer gives by far the
most repeatable results here. This is because they are
simply a constant mass to be accelerated. This mass cannot
change from one week to the next, and its rate of
acceleration is timed on each revolution directly and
digitally. A braked
Dynamometer generally has a few things against it here.
For a start they use some kind of brake (water, electrical
EMF or electro-motive-feedback, Disk brake, etc) to hold the revs steady or rising
slowly.
These brakes are subject to variation due to
friction, resistance changes due to temperature, etc.
And the torque measurement is measured generally by a "load
cell" which in turn can be both calibrated wrongly, and is
subject to a degree of Hysterisis, and or a slightly "non
proportional or linear" output. In addition this
analog dc voltage output is then converted to digital by an
analog digital converter introducing further small errors.
From this torque reading Horsepower is calculated as Power =
Torque x RPM (Or torque x road speed = horsepower can
be plotted and used but now we have no RPM scale for the
graph, or engine torque reading.
|
|
|
-
Accuracy
Sometimes
really accurate power figures are important. For example
when I was was working for Bike Magazines like Performance
Bikes, they wanted to see the difference accurately between
last years model, and the latest one. This maybe a
1bhp or 1 percent difference. Generally
only inertial types can be truly this accurate, especially over
time. Here (inertia type) there is and can be no "calibration" or drum
mass changes, whereas there are DC voltages from sensors,
and many other variables on most braked dyno setups. These in fact have recommended calibration checks by most of
the big manufacturers. But the very fact that
they CAN be calibrated unlike good inertial dynos gives rise
to great concern over any quoted figures! People
"like" big numbers.
|
|
-
NO "Engine"
or flywheel figures can ever be completely accurate for a
variety of reasons, discussed
here
so all of this relates to REAR WHEEL measured, corrected power.
-
Conclusion
If you
want really truly accurate, power figures that can be
relied upon, an inertia dynamometer will always be
superior subject to it being from a good manufacturer
such as the US based Dyno-Jet outfit., or my own(!) (for a variety of
reasons) and you also need to read most of the
rest of this site! They are not all created
equal...
Here is an example
of a bike (my own bike and dyno as it happens) running on an
inertial dynamometer. The blue line is with nitrous boost
from 7400 rpm onwards. But what's interesting is how
close the two curves are before this point. Especially as
one run was done in 4th gear, and the Nitrous run done in
5th gear to prevent the nitrous from causing wheel spin.
The result (Power in hp plotted against engine RPM) shows
that the two traces for engine power v RPM are almost
identical until the nitrous suddenly takes over. These
runs were weeks apart, with different pressures and
temperatures and humidity AND in different gears and on
entirely different Dynos! One was on my customers
dynamometer (one of my own "make") the other was on my
mobile dynamometer at Bruntingthorpe.
I doubt that you
could get this kind of consistency and repeatability from
any two braked dyno systems. This is needed to
see the TRUE results of tiny changes on different days and
or dynamometers.

|
| |
All content, design,
images, text, information copyright
DynoPower Dynamometer Systems
&
John C Williamson |
|